Report comment

@ J

"The first step on this would be to remove nepotism from judicial appointments, judiciary should be trained in dispute resolution, they should have to undergo a legal driving test to check their knowledge & suitability. Lawyers should not need a law degree and technology should be used for all money claims, mediation should be legally binding, family cases should be non adversarial with non blame culture and in open court."

You lost then. Fair enough. What about the other party? One presumes she "won" (not the appropriate word, but you understand the point). So does she think that the judges are nepotistic and corrupt and cafcass is biased and so on and so on? .....

Had you obtained the outcome you were looking for (taking a wild guess here, I am thinking along the lines of mother put in jail for contempt of court for bringing children to meeting a couple of hours late, resulting in mother losing her income, her home, children going into care, hating you for the rest of their lives, etc.) would the judges have remained corrupt and nepotistic?