Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

15 November 2014 08:07 am Not sure what client satisfaction has to do with costs budgeting. By and large the point is we intend to charge the Defendant those costs when we win, not our clients who are on CFAs and frankly don't give a monkeys how much it all costs as long as they get their settlement. The point is that the whole system now artificially caps how much we can charge before we know the full extent of the job, and all the people doing the capping have no idea what they're doing.

To labour the metaphor even more: It's more like the kitchen suppliers were asked to provide a quote (which they are to be held to) for the original Anon's kitchen, with only photographs of the room. And then the local council steps in and decides the building is listed so all the work has to be changed half way though the job to fit within the relevant rules. And all through this anon is arguing that the costs are too high based on...because he says so.

What about that sounds okay to you?

Your details

Cancel