Report comment

There is probably a place for "world-class legal technologists" instead of conventional lawyers, but not exclusively so long as humans keep on having messy problems which require something more than a 'computer says' solution. In 35 years of mainly disputes work I don't recall a single matter which had a straightforward technical answer a robot could give. In every case (including with corporate clients) there was a human element which influenced (if not dictated) the best and desired solution.

Legal technology certainly shouldn't be ignored, but for being the sole means of solving human made problems? Naaa.