Report comment

Presumably they would argue that they do not recover the full value of their investigations.

As an aside - perhaps they should actually start filing reasonable costs budgets rather than keeping them artificially low to make the claimant look bad.

I suspect however that they are not referring to solicitors costs which are recoverable at the end of the action but to their internal investigation costs AKA. spying and data manipulation. Gotta keep their "fraud investigation executives", or whatever stupid name they want to come up with next, in a job.

They probably don't recover a great deal either where judgment is to be enforced against the Claimant. The ATE insurers will not pick up the tab.