Report comment

@David Crawford Commented on: 23 February 2017 12:24 GMT:

"....I don't know the answer to your questions, Rayner, but doubtless The Masters of The Universe do and one or more will tell you. ..."

I suspect DC that what one does is:

1. Work out what might be achieved at each stage of investigation', (if you can say what our mutual critique, Anon below) is such.

2. Then one ups the ATE Premium (that in any event is never paid until "conclusion" - so the ATE can be the subject of Assessment and then be taken out of quantum).

3. This could be done at each appropriate stage (say four month period but under the discretion of the 'purchaser' (likely under the LEI Directive 1990, to be a hived off Insurers owned "Law Firm".

4. One can see that you could easily circumvent anything left of the rule against Maintenance and Champerty (after the AJA 2000).

Clever, very clever if this is what they are up to. I would not say Fraud but calculated assert stripping of the public purse in Med Neg matters / causes ....