Report comment

It's many years too late now but in the case of Peters v Bottomley in the early 90s someone, somewhere should have demanded from judge Arthur Hutchinson his reasoning for rejecting Bottomleys Pleaded Case which had remained constant for 5 years in favour of a conflicting pack of lies which had been conjured up on the steps to the court. There was one pack of lies to gain legal aid certificates by deception and a conflicting pack of lies to gain a perverse and outcome driven judgement that meant that he had got away with the crime of Obtaining Goods and Services by Deception through the civil court 'system'.