Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.
Have to disagree with Neil Hickman too. This was dishonesty: he manipulated the situation and covered up the reason by offering an innocent/false explanation which sought to deflect suspicion. Some may laud it as gamesmanship, but I think it is dishonesty. It was not skill that reversed the odds, it was dishonesty. He was not telling the truth when he said he was superstitious - that was a clear lie, and he accepted that.
Whether or not some regard it as skilful does not change the fact that it was dishonest.
Copyright © 2019 The Law Society
Site powered by Webvision Cloud