Report comment

'There is a case for limiting damages for loss of earnings to the amount necessary to support a reasonable standard of living, rather than the superior standard of living which the richest accident victims might have expected if they had not been injured.’

. . . . says born-with-a-silver-spoon-in-his-mouth, member of the "million a year club" Supreme Court judge who has never had his livelihood taken away by somebody else's carelessness

No wonder judges are seen as out-of-touch ivory tower dwellers!!