Report comment

Reply to post @ 09:01 GMT

Again you make it sound like a commodity, most of the "whiplash" "sprains" that are presented by medical "experts" would not stand up in court under scrutiny and certainly would fail to meet the criteria set out in JCG, there is anecdotal evidence of this on this post and I could possibly provide 1000's of similar cases.
Its the claimant sector that promises the MAX benefit and pigeon holes awards again simply to try and prove there is a need for Paralegal clubs churning out rubbish.
Remember most insurers record calls and i'm aware that most of the evidence that has been presented by the ABI is based on recordings and testimonies by claimants and defendant's about the trading practices of claimant solicitors .
In layman's terms the company I work for has presented over 100 witness statements including telephone recordings of the claimant PI sector trying to get claimants to submit claims against an insurer, these witness's are claimants and defendants alike, your plea's are simply falling on deaf ears as you have no support from the people you claim to be trying to help