Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.


'In his oral evidence the Respondent explained that he had realised that no-one would accept that the management, and in particular TK who was the 51% shareholder, had no knowledge of the deficit. Such a position was farcical. It was simply not feasible that TK did
not notice that £1.6 million was missing from the client account; indeed, he was fully aware as he had directed the withdrawal of those monies.' As taken from the judgment on MrClarke.

Your details