Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.


To Anon 7 February 2018 10:10 GMT

You are clearly missing the crux of the case. It's about the disgraceful task of Defendants ignoring Claimants representatives and approaching them direct. This never has been and should never be allowed. The client has instructed someone to represent them, the opponent should communicate via the representative.

If the client sacks the representative and deals direct that is entirely different.

It is such a shame that you come across as rather immature and a keyboard warrior just making stupid inflammatory statements. If you want to troll go elsewhere.

Your details