Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

@Anonymous; Commented on: 12 July 2018 12:53 GMT:

"...Hmmm. A rather misleading headline, this, because it implies that at one time there was some progress.

What the figures actually show is that year-on-year since 2014 there has been no increase in the proportion of non-barrister Judges in either the Courts or the Tribunals and that overall we are 3% down on the position in 2014.

Most stark is the percentage for the Courts as a whole. JAC stats tell us that solicitors make up about 85% of the eligible pool from which appointments can be made but (as these latest stats show) only 34% of the Judges, and that they are bunched mostly at the lowest level. ..."

I suspect that the only way around this is to Make the Judiciary a separate 'Professional' Qualification on top of Firstly Solicitor then Barrister / Advocate (again the latter a separate College and with separate entry exams).

If you read the History of the Serjeant At Law (The Order of the Coif; J.F. Pollock), they abolished the office with the Court of Common Pleas. Those remaining were looking rather wistful at the end in Court after the Judicature Acts 1873-1875.

I suspect the only way around this is to make all Judicial Offices a College that one studies for and passes Professional Exams to join.

The tap on the shoulder obviously continues at the moment, for the moment....

Your details

Cancel