Report comment

In fact, the issue was whether there had been iniquity which meant legal professional privilege did not apply. The pub conversation did not hold sway, although very ill advised. It was the email what done it.

Note that the claimant was anonymously sent by post a copy of the offending email which was between a senior lawyer, A to a lawyer, B who had been assigned to the company where the claimant worked.

No doubt that fact is currently exercising A and B.

No sex involved, so why do you suppose anonymity is given to the firms involved.

Not magic circle by any chance?