Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

In other words, the SDT disallowed (inter partes) the entirety of Capsticks' fees (including the trial fees, the advocate being a Capsticks employee)? If so, that is extraordinary and merited a more detailed explanation than “The Tribunal did not consider that the costs of matters between the SRA and Capsticks Solicitors should be payable by the Respondent”.

The disallowed costs are funded/borne by the profession generally. What do Capsticks and the SRA have to say about the costs order? Has the Gazette asked them for a comment?

Your details

Cancel