Report comment

There are clearly a bunch of lay persons posting ill-judges opinions on here (at least I sincerely hope they are). It seems everyone has missed a rather pertinent fact in their rush to conclude racism. Ms Popal was already briefed right up to a trial which was ineffective due to lack of judge. How long was she counsel for? The longer it was the less likely race was the factor. Could it be the client had no confidence in her competence and wanted to revert to what he’s always had before?