Report comment

Trumped up nonsense charges - of course there wasn't any real danger - they were concerned about saving lives on a single plane that hadn't yet moved (so when it snows and planes get grounded they don't know what to do either?) they weren't running in the way of other planes - zero real danger, wish I had been on the jury NOT GUILTY! These were sensible protesters, highlighting a very serious eventuality for the welfare and risk to life of others - not their selfish interests, which is common in most other examples, can think of no better place to try to prevent it at the very last minute, then on the airplane before it starts its engines, rather like that Chinese man in front of the tank except the diesel sound on that was a bit more frightening - but both for the desire to preserve life being the shared common denominator. Courts and certain interests bodies trying to show their clout and control instead of interpreting things sensibly particularly given the why and for who questions.. SRA should lose the file on this one or express for once how passionate and brave these individuals actually were for the greater good, justice and preservation of life and not let it taint them in any way.