Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

I am a LiP and if there weren't so many Solicitors/Barristers blatantly ignoring the CPR Rules for Disclosure, and other Rules. Or replying to a Properly and legally constructed Part 18 List, by replying (1) Were not going to waste time answering them. (2) That they had included a copy of my Part 18 in their Bundle for Case Management, (but not answered any of the questions at all, simply stating , "but didn't think the Court would bother"!) Ignoring the correct Rule for method of Answering a Part 18 by Seperate Letter, completely. Refusing multiple requests for documents or information, including for a clean copy of a "changed" document, stating I committed abuse of process. When they are concealing evidence. The Courts need to tighten up on those who are "Qualified" and abuse the System, and who have far greater knowledge, (or should have), of the Rules. It would shorten the process if the main Defendant/Claimant had to sign a Statement of Truth at the Start. Friends who have used "Arbitration" have found it to be an even greater scam for Solicitors to get money from Clients, and even when they won it cost them £10's of thousands. Even more than Court would have. It is not a Just or balanced system where LiP are expected to possess same knowledge as a person who has spent years studying and also has backing from others in Firm and Access to "Legal Websites". Every reasonable person should be able to have access to the Courts, with a Legitimate Claim. Accessing Justice should not be restricted to the Legal Profession, Wealthy or those with Insurance.

Your details

Cancel