Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.


You are so right, Nicholas! What if the ‘Respondent’ responds to the Petitioner’s Statement that as far as he/she is concerned the marriage has not irretrievable broken down – has there to be a hearing to decide whether or not that is the case? If there is, whoever is successful will blame the other party, so ‘No fault divorce’ is an absurdity! If a marriage has broken down it is usually because of the fault of one party or other, or the fault of both parties however much the ‘do-gooders’ want to say otherwise. The number of married parties who happily drift apart with smiles on their faces, both scattering rose petals as they skip on their way humming a cheerful song, instead of getting hot under the collar and foaming at the mouth about arrangements for the children or who is going to have the house etc., you could, I imagine count on one hand (relatively). The only real answer (and I have said this before in these columns) is to do away with marriage as a legal concept. ‘Marriage’ is a contract and you cannot (in any other branch of the law) walk away from a contract and think you can get away with it. Those who are serious in wanting to commit their lives to each other, either in the sight of God or as a civil pledge could still do so, either in a Church or a Synagogue or a Mosque or somewhere else of their choice. They have tried to bring in ‘no-fault’ divorce before and what a disaster that was! ‘Fault’ is a reasonable basis to cause a marriage (not to forget civil-partnerships of course) to be dissolved – allowing one party just to walk away from such a union is not.
By the way, Anon. 14.54, it is universally accepted by theological academics that the story of the woman taken in adultery (John 8: 2-11) was a much later addition to ‘John’s’ Gospel, (i.e. a made-up story) as the earliest known manuscripts do not have it. Not that this makes any difference to your argument, it’s just me being finicky!

Your details