Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.
Why does Bhatt Murphy require an explanation as to what they do (as though it were not blindingly obvious given the context), whereas no such needless explanation is provided in respect of the GLS or Liberty? I mean, if otiose descriptions are apparently a required thing, why not apply them equally and to all?
Copyright © 2019 The Law Society
Site powered by Webvision Cloud