Jackson takes hard line on firm’s late court document
Lord Justice Jackson has upheld a £211,000 claim won by default after the defendant missed their final chance to submit a court document.
Sitting in the Court of Appeal, Jackson, whose reforms formed the basis of civil case management rules, said Oak Cash and Carry’s solicitors had been too late in applying for relief from sanctions.
Attempting to defend a claim from an electricity supplier in British Gas Trading Ltd v Oak Cash & Carry Ltd, the defendant’s firm, south-east practice Bower and Bailey LLP, had already failed to file a pre-trial checklist within a three-month deadline set by a district judge.
After being given an 'unless' order, in effect extending the deadline by two weeks, the defendant failed to serve the checklist until two days after the new limit.
Even then, Jackson said the non-compliance could have been dealt with more leniently, but by the time Bower and Bailey applied for relief from sanctions a month later, the trial date had been lost. Judgment was given in the claimant’s favour by default.
‘The defendant’s lack of promptness in applying for relief is the critical factor,’ said Jackson, following a hearing last month.
‘When that delay is added to all the other factors, it can be seen that the defendant’s default has substantially disrupted the progress of the action.’
Testing the case against the judgments in Mitchell and Denton, Jackson added: ‘It is not possible to classify the defendant’s breach as anything other than significant and serious.’
The Court of Appeal heard that during the three months the defendant’s solicitors were given to comply, the solicitor assigned to the case was called away with personal difficulties.
Despite being a firm of ‘significant size’ with more than 40 solicitors, the court heard the case was handed to a trainee.
Jackson said a central issue was whether the non-compliance with the ‘unless’ order should be taken in isolation or added to the delays previously.
He added: ‘The court usually only makes an "unless" order against a party which is already in breach.
‘The unless order gives that party additional time for compliance with the original obligation and specifies an automatic sanction in default of compliance. It is not possible to look at an unless order in isolation.’
The default judgment against Oak Cash and Carry was allowed to stand.