Legal services in rural Wales ‘could die out’

Topics: Legal aid and access to justice,Social welfare & housing

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (8)
  • Save

Related images

  • Welshsenydd

Legal services will cease to exist in rural Wales if current trends continue, a report on access to advice on social welfare law warns today. 

Publishing its Wales Manifesto for Advice, the Low Commission set up by the Legal Action Group says recruitment into training, legal practice and specialisation in the rural legal economy is ‘inadequate’ to provide for the longer term.

Advertisement

‘Currently, there is a population of rural solicitors ageing over time without new blood to replenish firms for the future,’ the commission says. ‘This decline is not due to the lack of demand for legal services; reasons range from regulatory disincentives to lack of management capacity to grow legal businesses.’

Law firms, it says, play an important role in relation to land management, livestock ownership, planning issues, property in family breakdowns and wills.

The commission proposes creating ‘enhanced’ capacity at the ‘second tier’, which would consist of frontline advisers, agencies and firms providing online and telephone access to expertise on Welsh legal matters ‘to help frontline groups to do their jobs’.

The manifesto is ‘directed towards’ the next Welsh government and assembly, with proposals for the period up to 2020.

The commission urges Welsh ministers to ‘negotiate’ with the Ministry of Justice for a share of the legal aid budget as a 'precondition' of any further devolution of executive or legislative competence in areas of criminal, civil and family law, or 'evolution' of distinct legal and judicial structures.

Spending priorities should be determined by the Welsh government and administered through Welsh agencies.

It also proposes that the Welsh government, working the National Advice Network, establish a single ‘clearing house’ process for all public funding programmes involving advice services.

The commission says: ‘Currently, there is significant potential for overlap and/or for delivery targets to become skewed by short-term priorities.

‘There are also concerns in a fragmented and highly pressured funding environment that only larger organisations with professional fundraising operations will thrive, rather than promoting a diverse partnership or providers each playing to their strengths, reaching into communities or helping those with particular needs.’

Readers' comments (8)

  • Just in rural Wales?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I agree Simon.
    I practice in a good sized town in Yorkshire and I can see firms withering on the vine, with nothing moving in to replace them.
    Take PI out of the High Street and there will be no general high street practices left anywhere. Rural Wales is the thin end of the wedge.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Agreed, 'everywhere on the high street ' is more accurate.

    LB

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • "The commission says: ‘Currently, there is significant potential for overlap and/or for delivery targets to become skewed by short-term priorities.

    ‘There are also concerns in a fragmented and highly pressured funding environment that only larger organisations with professional fundraising operations will thrive, rather than promoting a diverse partnership or providers each playing to their strengths, reaching into communities or helping those with particular needs."

    Why do civil servants continue to utter such complete garbage?

    This sort of tedious and incomprehensible string of cliches sounds as though it's been generated by a 1980's computer.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • They're not civil servants.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I practice in a town in rural Wales at 58 I am the youngest solicitor in the town.
    A few years ago there were 5 or 6 firms now 3.
    In 10 years or less there will be none

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • They can use insurers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • It's not just a question of the quantity which is an issue here, have a look at the quality while you're at it.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (8)
  • Save

Mr Justice Foskett

Linklaters escapes ‘unprecedented’ disclosure order

29 July 2016By

High Court says strong grounds required to direct a review of e-disclosure in claim against mining company. 

Thirlwall

Judge orders SDT to try again after botched strike-out

29 July 2016By

Mrs Justice Thirlwall says the prosecution case was not an abuse of process.

Legal aid desert map

Shocking infographic highlights housing ‘advice deserts’

28 July 2016By

Law Society chief executive Catherine Dixon urges government to commission providers to prevent conflicts of interest.