MoJ not ‘transparent’ enough on gifts and hospitality

Topics: Government & politics

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (11)
  • Save

Related images

  • MoJ

The Ministry of Justice has failed to meet transparency requirements relating to gifts and hospitality, the National Audit Office has found.

The Cabinet Office requires central government departments to report the hospitality accepted by senior officials each quarter.


A report published by the NAO today, Investigation into the acceptance of gifts and hospitality, shows that the ministry was among five of 17 departments that had not published this information for every quarter from April 2012 to March 2015.

The ministry, along with the Home Office, Foreign & Commonwealth Office and Department for Transport, published hospitality transparency data for nine of 12 quarters. The Ministry of Defence published data for 10 quarters.

However, the MoJ had one of the lowest acceptance rates for hospitality – 87 senior officials accepted a gift or hospitality, between April 2012 and March 2015. This figure includes an estimated 22 cases based on the average number of cases in the quarters where returns were published.

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Justice said the department was 'committed' to meeting its transparency requirements.

'All of this data has now been published apart from some of the data for one quarter, which will be published shortly,' the spokesperson said.

The NAO said ‘modest’ hospitality was ‘sometimes justified’ as officials ‘often need to engage with a range of external contacts in order to carry out their work efficiently and effectively’.

Hospitality might involve ‘no more than sandwiches provided during a meeting in the middle of the day’. Gifts were often low-value items and declining them, in certain circumstances, ‘might cause offence’.

However, the NAO said rules and processes on gifts and hospitality ‘could be more stringent’.

NAO head Amyas Morse said: ‘Public officials are sometimes offered gifts and hospitality by external stakeholders which it is reasonable for them to accept. This can, however, present a risk of actual or perceived conflicts of interest, and undermine value for money or affect government’s reputation.’

Morse said most, ‘but not all’, cases declared by officials ‘appear on the face of it to be justifiable in the normal course of business’, but the NAO found ‘some weaknesses’ in the oversight and control of gifts and hospitality.

‘This needs to be addressed by the Cabinet Office and departments,’ Morse said.

Readers' comments (11)

  • Especially all those gifts from the Insurance Industry...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dare I suggest that the NAO spends less time looking at the MoJ's intake of freebie sandwiches and direct its efforts at the huge and scandalous waste of money thrown at crazy policies such as duty provider contracts.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'd wager over 90% of the gifts were from the Insurance Industry. Blatant corruption.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why don't they just ban this practice?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I'd quite like to know what the rules are for MOJ staff being lobbied by, say, the insurance industry, and wonder whether a FOI might be in the offing here... in fact, I think I may just do that

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Go ahead, Paul. Dare you.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I recall a leading Defendant PI Law firm in the 1980s having a Villa in Spain which they made available to leading lights in the Insurance Industry. No doubt the recipients learnt from the experience and now do the same with Politicians and the MOJ.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Better do it quick Paul before your request is dealt with by The Attorney General!Cant see any conflict of onterest there!You couldnt make it up.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • One might add that the NAO fiddles whilst the CJS burns (money on outsourcing as the comment above points out)

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • 2011 position was this:-

    FOI request is now desperately sought. Who will do it?

    As somebody described it on here previously as (a little exaggerated mind but...) "this country's Watergate"

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10per page20per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (11)
  • Save

Petty france

Third-party JR funders must be allowed anonymity – Law Society

25 August 2016By

Ministry of Justice says identification of funders giving more than £3,000 will ensure equality of arms.


Buy-to-let tax changes ‘legislation by stealth’

24 August 2016By

Law Society says amendments at committee stage 'set disturbing precedent'. 

Jeremy Wright QC MP

‘Unduly lenient’ sentences hiked for 102 offenders

24 August 2016By Gazette reporter

Number has risen 13% since 2010, but requests have more than doubled – suggesting judges ‘generally get sentencing right’.