Senior judge voices concern over police investigation control

Topics: Criminal justice,Courts business

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (4)
  • Save

Related images

  • Lordjusticefulford

Judges must ‘tread carefully’ if they are granted powers to control the length of police investigations, the senior presiding judge for England and Wales has said in response to human rights organisation Justice’s report on complex and lengthy criminal trials.

The report recommends that police investigations should have a time limit of 12 months from the first interview with a suspect.

Advertisement

After 12 months a suspect could apply to the local resident judge to review the investigation ‘with the power to order an investigation cease if continuation is deemed unreasonable’.

However, at an event to publish the report, Lord Justice Fulford (pictured) questioned ‘whether it would truly be appropriate for a judge to control the length of time that an investigation lasts’.

‘This would arguably be a new world for us,’ he added. Fulford acknowledged that judges already issue warrants and the extension of pre-trial detention. But he warned: ‘The judiciary need to tread carefully when invited into pastures where wolves, rather than sheep, may dwell.’

Justice’s report states that problems associated with complex and lengthy criminal trials persist despite ‘various’ reviews and protocols.

A recent National Audit Office investigation into the efficiency of the criminal justice system shows that the number of sexual offences cases in the Crown court has risen by 12% in the past five years.

Prosecutions for other serious offences that can involve complex evidence and multiple defendants, such as terrorism, organised crime, drugs and fraud, have also increased.

Justice’s working party, chaired by former director of public prosecutions Sir David Calvert-Smith, recommends that a trial judge be assigned from plea and trial-preparation hearing ‘who robustly manages the case and identifies the issues as early as possible, and where appropriate a commercial court judge with criminal experience’.

Evidence should be presented electronically in all complex and lengthy trials and disclosed to defence counsel ‘so its accuracy can be checked well ahead of trial’.

Trial judges ‘should be aware’ of jurors’ and parties’ unavoidable appointments and holidays. Juror ‘alternates’ should be engaged. The jury should be given a ‘dedicated’ room to ‘discuss and review’ evidence.

The report also recommends that jurors receive additional written material to help them understand the legal issues involved, including parties’ pleadings, legal directions, photos of witnesses and a ‘neutral’ summary of their evidence.

Fulford said the report was ‘beyond doubt a mine of really fantastic ideas’.

He asked the event ‘if we are in danger of missing a trick’ by not integrating some of the report’s recommendations into a cross-agency initiative to build a single case management system for the Crown Prosecution Service and HM Courts and Tribunals Service, entitled ‘Common Platform’.

Through the platform, which is in the early development stage, case files will start when the police gather evidence, and all parties will have access when needed.

Readers' comments (4)

  • Has the time come where we might consider, for a trial period at least, adopting the French system of a 'huge d'instruction' who 'case manages' criminal prosecutions? He has no role once the matter goes for trial, but he can direct what evidence should be obtained and complaints can be made to him if there seems to be some sort of abuse going on. He is 'neutral', well as 'neutral' as any person involved in prosecutions can be in a post-revolutionary state... should I just say 'supposed to be neutral'.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • PS 'juge d'instruction' of course...damn predictive text!

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • You would have thought that it would be deemed common sense if after 12 months from the date of first interview the matter would be ceased if by then the police have STILL rocked up with sweet Fanny-Adams!

    But oh noooooo it's being suggested here that the accused should have to make an application to have it reviewed in their bid to have the matter ceased, which will therefore inevitably expunge yet more finance and time on what sounds to me to be a frigging waste of time and money anyway.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • The power to arrest and detain people should be more greatly restricted. People should only be arrested if there is evidence that they have committed the offence and they are a flight risk or it is feared and can be justified that the person will interfere with justice. Attending voluntarily should be the norm.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (4)
  • Save

Westminster Bridge

MPs probe role of sharia councils in British law

27 June 2016By

Select committee inquiry separate from independent review commissioned by Home Office.

Manchester support legal aid placard

'Borderline' civil cases no longer eligible for legal aid

25 June 2016By

Legal Aid Agency announces it has changed its approach to assessing merits.

High Court

Party penalised in case 'crying out' for sensible negotiation

25 June 2016By

Judge says defendant failed to make full disclosure or entertain settlement.

Advertisement

Sign up for email news alerts

Daily Update. Keep abreast of the latest developments that affect the profession

Legal Services

Browse the magazine

Current Issue

The Gazette offers you up-to-the-minute national and international news, opinion, features, in-depth articles plus a jobs and appointments section.

Please click the link below for a digital edition