Supreme Court to hear two challenges on access to justice

Topics: Costs, fees and funding,Employment,Legal aid and access to justice,Courts business

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (4)
  • Save

Related images

  • Supreme Court

The Supreme Court is to hear two cases with far-reaching consequences for access to justice.

The court announced this morning that it has granted permission to appeal decisions in judicial review cases regarding employment tribunal fees and the residency test for legal aid.

Advertisement

In August, trade union Unison failed in its challenge to the government’s employment tribunal fee regime.

The Court of Appeal ruled it could not be inferred that a drop in the number of employment claims was entirely down to potential claimants' inability to afford fees.

Three months later the Court of Appeal ruled that government plans to introduce a residence test for civil legal aid eligibility were lawful.

The lord chancellor had appealed the High Court’s decision the previous year that the legislation he proposed to introduce was unlawful on the grounds it was ultra vires and unjustifiably discriminatory.

To satisfy the residence test, an individual would need to be lawfully resident in the UK, the Channel Islands, Isle of Man or a British overseas territory on the day of the application for civil legal aid.

Unless they were under 12 months old or a particular kind of asylum claimant, or involved with the UK armed forces, applicants would have had to be lawfully resident for a 12-month period.

The Supreme Court said R (on the application of UNISON) v The Lord Chancellor and R (on the application of the Public Law Project) v The Lord Chancellor ‘will be listed to be heard in due course’.

Readers' comments (4)

  • "..The Court of Appeal ruled it could not be inferred that a drop in the number of employment claims was entirely down to potential claimants' inability to afford fees. "

    That must be the case surely? Who do you correlate the two issues?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Raynor-- are you after Crawford's crown for the most annoying poster?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Why do you say that?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • And who are you, who says that?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (4)
  • Save

Rolls Building

IT success stories show online court can work – Briggs

29 September 2016By

Lord Justice Briggs says recent examples of IT in the courts – the Crown court digital case system and Rolls Building e-filing – show what can be achieved.

LSB offices, One Kemble Street

LSB softens ‘prescriptive’ diversity approach

29 September 2016By

Consultation paper says some regulators have moved past 2011 guidance.

Royal Courts of Justice, Strand London

Legal aid safety net applications soar

29 September 2016By

Legal Aid Agency granted just over half of the 424 applications for exceptional case funding received between April and June.

Advertisement

Sign up for email news alerts

Daily Update. Keep abreast of the latest developments that affect the profession

Legal Services

Browse the magazine

Current Issue

The Gazette offers you up-to-the-minute national and international news, opinion, features, in-depth articles plus a jobs and appointments section.

Please click the link below for a digital edition