Global firm negligent over £25m property advice

Topics: Conveyancing,Professional negligence

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (5)
  • Save

Related images

  • Royal Courts of Justice

International firm Bird & Bird has been ordered to pay £1.8m in damages after a court found it had failed to inform clients buying a London property of a nearby development.

The firm says it is considering an appeal. 


Orientfield Holdings Ltd took out the professional negligence claim against its former solicitors after buying a residential property in the St John’s Wood area for £25m.

The company claimed that Bird & Bird did not advise of a proposed substantial development close to the property which would have negatively affected the use of the house.

Bird & Bird had obtained a planning report revealing the existence of the development, but this was not disclosed and Orientfield signed a contract to buy the property, paying a £2.5m deposit which was forfeited when the transaction fell through. 

The claim was brought to recoup balance of the deposit after a settlement between Orientfield and the vendors.

On Friday, His Honour Judge Mark Pelling, sitting as a judge in the of the High Court, confirmed that Bird & Bird had been under a duty to inform Orientfield of the content of the planning report. Had the company been told of the details it would not have gone ahead with the purchase.

The claim was brought by London firm Wedlake Bell.

Partner David Golten said: ‘Clients rightly expect and should have professional advisers who act diligently to protect their interests. It has been a hard fought claim, and it is excellent that all of Orientfield’s loss has been recovered, including its legal costs.’

In a statement, Bird & Bird said: ‘We are disappointed with the result but we are discussing with our insurers the possibility of an appeal.’

Readers' comments (5)

  • Where's the judgment?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • What was the point of ordering a planning report if you don't then disclose its contents to your client? Would they still have been negligent if they had not ordered one in the first place? If I were in the position of Bird and Bird I would not e crowing about this and by appealing they are just flying a kite, or so it seems to me.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Surely you just send all searches and reports to your client with your report on title and contract with the usual ass covering proviso that we love. That's what I do. Can't understand how a firm like BB could be so daft. If they did send it to client then the client should be a grown up about this and read the report... And not take it out on his lawyer.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Was the Conveyancing fee earner properly qualified? Surely the disclosure should have been made to the client. Its not rocket science. Once again this demonstrates to me the shabby quailty of conveyancing done at low fees by the inexperienced..

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Dear Anon, you must be friends with my dear friend Miss Irene Onic? I doubt the BB fees were 'low' ....
    Nevertheless as you say 'not rocket science'
    Still I wonder if the client was being deliberately vulnerable. They do that you know ... Poor lambs...
    WE NEEED FACTS! who has the FACTS of this case so I can provide decent comment for you.....

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (5)
  • Save


Sign up for email news alerts

Daily Update. Keep abreast of the latest developments that affect the profession


LAW MERGERS BUSINESS FACILITATORS TO THE LEGAL PROFESSION Services Include: Mergers, Sales, Valuations, Practice Development, Feasibility Studies, Consultancy. CONTACT IN CONFIDENCE: Neville or Mack Dinshaw LAW MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS DX 42809 Kingsbury Tel: 020 8204 3600 Fax: 020 8204 4654 Email: Web: WORLDWIDE CLIENT BASE QUALITY MANAGEMENT ISO9001 Registered Firm

SELLING? MERGING? VALUING? Acquiring? Free information from 01494 483728. or

DUE TO THE retirement of one of two Partners in a Bolton based firm we are now seeking interested parties to join / merge. T/O in excess of £300k. Email

SMALL EAST MIDLANDS Practice seeks sale or merger. Good mix of Property, Private Client work with some litigation. Leased premises till beginning of November 2016, minimal dilapidations and willing to move. Turnover £440,000.00 per annum. Contact 07825 632078.

Browse the magazine

Current Issue

The Gazette offers you up-to-the-minute national and international news, opinion, features, in-depth articles plus a jobs and appointments section.

Please click the link below for a digital edition