Slater and Gordon share price plunges 46% as crisis mounts

Topics: Alternative business structures,Law firm & practice management

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (44)
  • Save

The value of embattled Australia-listed firm Slater and Gordon fell to another all-time low today as the market responded to financial concerns revealed yesterday. 

Shares on the Australian stock exchange closed at A$.0.31 (16p), down 46% on the day. 


Trading reopened on Monday following an announcement that the company lost around £492.5m in the final six months of 2015. That news prompted share values to drop from $A0.83 $A0.58.

As recently as last April, the company was trading at more than A$8 (£4) a share, before the acquisition of the professional services division of Quindell and subsequent profit falls.

A writedown of acquired Quindell assets accounted for much of the losses, but a further £38m was lost in Australia, and £19.5m lost in six months across the group’s other UK entities.

Lenders have given the company until the end of April to present a new plan for reorganising the business, with the likelihood that a number of offices in the UK will close. Currently the firm employs almost 4,000 people in England and Wales, operating from 20 sites.

No further detail has been released on plans for the UK business, although it is understood consultation on some redundancies will begin this week.

The Australian press has speculated that the company will need to take drastic steps to manage the crisis. The Sydney Morning Herald suggests that the firm will be under pressure to settle a swathe of cases in the next month to satisfy its lenders.

It has also been reported that managing director Andrew Grech offered his resignation to the Slater and Gordon board, but this was unanimously rejected.

Analysis – John Hyde

It's going to be a tall order for a watered-down business to deliver the sort of results needed to revive the company. The idea that income from personal injury claims, at a time when the UK government has them firmly in its sights, will keep the lenders happy is optimistic. Read more

One of the firms considering a class action on behalf of shareholders in Slater and Gordon has said it is ‘almost certain’ that litigation will commence.

Andrew Watson, national head of class actions at Maurice Blackburn Lawyers, said: ‘The sheer size and scale of this writedown casts enormous doubt on the adequacy of disclosures made by Slater and Gordon in relation to the true value of the Quindell assets.’

Meanwhile, a rival firm announced today that a stalwart of one of the UK firms acquired by Slater and Gordon has taken up a partnership with it.

Rose Gibson, who had been with north-west firm Fentons since 1996 before it was amalgamated into the Slater and Gordon brand, has joined Simpson Millar as a partner in its specialist multi-track personal injury practice.

Gibson said: ‘Simpson Millar has the forward-thinking attitude, the track record and the experienced team that will allow me to keep doing the work I love.’

Readers' comments (44)

  • A shareholders class action is much like two people jumping out of an aeroplane, and then setting about one another with baseball bats to determine whose fault it is that they have not got parachutes. They both end up bruised and battered and hit the ground very hard.
    Anyone who bought shares in S+G at the time leading up to the Quindell purchase can only blame themselves for not having read the criticisms of that transaction that were in the press for all to see.
    After the purchase the share price hung in mid air, like a cartoon character that has run off a cliff, until gravity took over in mid June 2015. Any one who did not sell their shares before that has only themselves to blame.
    Any one who bought S+G shares after the Quindell purchase can blame their psychiatrist.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Relief in the Gibson household this morning. I wonder how many of her clients will follow her?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • One assumes that the SRA are already on site, to ensure that all S&G fee-earners comply with their professional responsibilities to their clients rather than complying with any directives from their bankers.

    But probably not...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well put, Ian. What surprises me is that anyone is prepared to buy any of S&G's shares today.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Yes, certainly relief!! Arriving at Simpson Millar feels like a home-coming, and back to what we had at Fentons. I feel for some of the lovely people that I have left behind, but had made plans to leave Slater and Gordon long before the problems emerged because S and G were not for me.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Ian - I dare say some IFA's will be feeling a little uneasy about the coming months...

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Well done Rosemary.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • @Marshall Hall1 March 2016 01:28 pm:

    "....One assumes that the SRA are already on site, to ensure that all S&G fee-earners comply with their professional responsibilities to their clients rather than complying with any directives from their bankers.

    But probably not... "

    But they surely are? Only the other day they were paranoid about a person I know, having "Regulated by the SRA on their letter head (even though to do so was beyond their control).

    I am sure it is because as they will probably shortly be history, (well if not S & G., they only need one such failure to implode), they want to at least have some of the limelight for a short period.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • How long is it allowed to go on like this?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • I've noticed a number of company's who hold themselves out as due diligence specialists who are typically instructed when firms are being sold or valued for lending purposes. I wonder if any such firms were instructed here or if SG did it all by themselves. I mention this because of the toxicity surrounding quindell. The fall out has only just begun and I anticipate a lot of litigation will ensue.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

View results 10per page20per page50per page

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

  • Print
  • Share
  • Comments (44)
  • Save


Sign up for email news alerts

Daily Update. Keep abreast of the latest developments that affect the profession


SELLING? MERGING? VALUING? Acquiring? Free information from 01494 483728. or

SOLICITORS FIRM WANTED Sole Practitioner looking to retire or looking for business succession options. Please contact 07919 348734.

Browse the magazine

Current Issue

The Gazette offers you up-to-the-minute national and international news, opinion, features, in-depth articles plus a jobs and appointments section.

Please click the link below for a digital edition