Obiter is always happy to put its hands up and acknowledge an error, no matter how slight in terms of geography. Last week, we attempted to clarify for the legal profession the mystery of the location of Worth Matravers, the seat of the current Master of the Rolls, Lord Phillips (see [2005] Gazette, 2 June, 10). We are grateful to several correspondents who point out that in fact all we've done is confuse readers further. For the record, Worth Matravers is in Dorset, not Devon - although the two counties do share a short stretch of border and the comments about Lord Phillips's subtle dance floor moves still stand. Being pulled up on this matter opened a wider debate on the Obiter desk this week - the desire of just about every company-commercial solicitors' practice in London to be known as a City law firm, and indeed the willingness of newspapers and specialist publications to play along. Yes, even the Gazette itself is guilty, continuing to refer to the global giant, Clifford Chance, as being City-based, when clearly it bailed out of the Square Mile for a towering glass office block in London's Docklands some time ago. Suggestions (within reason, please) as to how we should refer to this legal profession behemoth - east London firm? Canary Wharf practice? A Thames Estuary (as opposed to Thames Valley) firm? Or just Eastenders?