After much speculation about our proposals to introduce competitive tendering for criminal lower legal aid in London, I am delighted that the debate has been opened (see [2005] Gazette, 3 February, 1 and 15; 10 February, 26).


Competitive tendering will work best for all concerned if we engage with each other in an open and constructive way. The consultation paper is designed to be as open as possible and sets out a framework for introducing competitive tendering with the detail to be decided as part of the consultation process. I would urge all legal aid solicitors, their representative bodies and other stakeholders to respond to the paper, which is available on-line at: www.legalservices.gov.uk.



Also on our Web site is a question-and-answer document, which addresses the queries and concerns raised in your articles.


I want to reassure your readers that quality of advice and outcomes achieved for clients will remain at the forefront of our thinking during the design of the competitive tendering process and following the introduction of new contracts. The paper raises specific questions on quality, on which I would particularly welcome the views of the profession. I am not prepared to see quality standards fall.


I believe London is exactly the right place to launch competitive tendering because of its vibrant market and the quality and efficiency of many London-based firms. Many have responded positively in the first week of the consultation, with more than 167 practitioners registering for the free business planning seminars organised by Business Link for London.


London firms can obtain more information about these seminars by telephoning: 0845 60 23 709.



Jonathan Lindley, executive director, service design, Legal Services Commission, London