ASYLUM FACTS VITAL

I write following a recent jaunt to the Home Office after a gap of four years for a screening interview in connection with an asylum application.After queuing in what can only be described as a huge cattle shed, my client and I were confronted by an enforcement officer who asked whether I spoke the language of my client.

After saying I did not, I was subjected to intimidating questions and comments suggesting I should be able to speak the language of all of the clients I accompany.I replied that I had no wish to enter The Guinness Book of World Records as the lawyer who can speak the most languages.The same attitude prevailed throughout the day with my client being directly threatened that he 'would be sussed out in the interview'.I was concerned to see that I was the only lawyer present.

Most firms had sent 'legal reps', many of whom did not even have a good grasp of the English language, let alone asylum law.

Most were glorified interpreters.

Faced with the hostility from the Home Office, it is imperative that 'legal reps' receive the necessary training with regard to asylum law and have the knowledge to make representations as well as being familiar with internal Home Office policies.However, the Legal Services Commission does not fund representation at screening interviews - except in the case of minors - and this leaves clients unrepresented.

Until this is resolved, immigration clients will continue to get a poor service from some firms who will not spend the time or money to train their staff.Harjap Bhangal, Charles Simmons Solicitors, Ilford, Essex