I agree with the comments of Law Society chief executive Janet Paraskeva that the right to appeal, associated with student and family visitors' visas, is vital (see [2005] Gazette, 9 June, 5).
Many entry clearance officers (ECOs) are routinely making 'paper decisions', without calling the applicants for interviews, as far as family visit visas are concerned. I have written and pointed out that this practice breaches section 6 and article 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 - breach of full and fair hearing and right of reply.
So far I have received no comment from the ECOs on this important issue. Therefore the removal of the right to appeal, on 'paper decisions', is unacceptable.
Janaki Vijayatunga, Vijay & Co, London
More from News
-
NewsPost Office victims urged to report excessive legal fees
Majority of lawyers not charging for compensation advice but reports of ‘problematic’ fees from some.
-
NewsBarrister suspended over failure to comply with court order
Disciplinary tribunal ordered the lawyer be prevented from practising for 36 months.
-
NewsStruck-off solicitor fails in bid to remain anonymous on appeal
Solicitor told court that ‘a struck-off solicitor is a social leper’, but had been 'advertising himself as a legal adviser'.
Partnership
Charity Explorer provides a reputable reference tool for solicitors, will-writers and their clients who want to leave a legacy or charitable gift.
Visit Charity Explorer
Whether you are looking for legal expert witnesses, legal training/CPD providers, international law firms, administration of estates, legal software suppliers, barristers chambers or any other general legal service, the Legal Services Directory will provide a suitable option.
Visit Legal Services Directory
No comments yet