Report comment

There is something completely unsavoury about the entire affair of these dedications from damages. When I started out client's damages where sacrosanct and somewhat "ring fenced". However, and they have to take there share of the blame, the government then encouraged deductions from damages limited to 25% to save their 'insurer overlords' a few quid; what did they expect to happen? The relativity is that PI work is SO unprofitable these days without taking 25% it simply is not worth doing esp with the fast track for RTA being moved to where it is. Why can you not simply say whatever you get you pay us 25% and if the client want to proceed on that basis then that should be the end of it . In all honesty the entire issue here is unpalatable and degrades the legal profession #lbut-let-the-squabbling-continue