Report comment

This isn't really news.

The CFA/ATE route is the one that leaves claimants without a bill if a case fails. That's pretty good. They have to pay if they win - ok that's the choice they make.

It isn't anywhere near as good for claimants as it was pre-2015 and subsequent years with cosst hammered down etc.. But that's the world we live in - big business gets the policies it wants and the rest have to live with it.

What isn't good is some (by no means all) seeing clients as cash cows. The bigger and bulk firms are the worst culprits and they are still not as efficient as they ough tto be. That plus costs padding and curious ATE arrangements are still an issue.

For myself I have no concerns about checkmylegalwhatever. Everything is explained and coumented, with no secret profieering anywahere. If we were all like that, this wouldn't be a thing.