Report comment

So, the causes of parental disagreement and the need of a knowledgeable, legally qualified arbiter aren't going to disappear. Just the knowledgeable, legally qualified arbiters. What are all those designated children-case DJs going to do?
And who is actually going to do the job? Social workers? cafcas staff. Maybe Probation Officers? Local Authority Dog Wardens?
I really thought Lord Munby had a grip on the Family Div but now it seems that he has caught the Grayling disease....you don't need any legal training or qualifications to be the Lord Chancellor so why should one need such to be a Judge. Does not " the greater include the lesser"? And if one can be the Head of the Judicial System and exercise one's functions without any sense of fair play or actually observing the Rules, it seems a good indicator that a similar situation can obtain in resolving parental disputes regarding children where the State sees no advantage in resolving those disputes within the function and provision by the State.
Most odd.