Report comment

Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.

Comment

It is always of concern when comments made here defy logic. Why would raising the SCT limit remove fraud? Surely, the fraudster will carry on making such claims because they are what they are.
A Claimant firm doesn't generally (if at all) have a Head of Fraud.. of course they don't, because each fee earner deals with the case and assesses the client from the inception of the case and considers any evidence obtained whether that is from the client or a third party and continues to assess the situation as the case develops.
If the fee earner has concerns he goes to a supervisor or a supervising partner ie there is generally a chain of capable people available to review the matter and the case is then dealt with accordingly.

I could go on but it would seem pointless, almost as pointless as telling the government that access to justice will be denied and the fraudsters and cmcs with multiply if you take solicitors (and most likely barristers) out of the equation.
I am sure the Govmt will just continue with the insurers agenda and damn Joe Public and those who would represent him. Just blindly follow what you have been told by the insurance industry regardless of any evidence in support. Put tens of thousands on the dole queue and deny access to justice eh.

logic it would appear isn't just defied, it is dead.

Your details

Cancel