Report comment

This was clearly a personal dispute. The consultant was not an "employee" in any sense and even if the employment tribunal ruled that he was an employee and made findings of discrimination, this wasn't a case of discrimination in the normal sense of an employer beating up the employee. And it follows that the SRA had no business of wasting time and money of referring the matter to the SDT. How exactly is this case in the public interest for it to be prosecuted? And is wasting the professions' money on costs in the public interest?