Report comment

Thanks for your explanation Paul and also thanks for using your name, rather than being anonymous. I agree that the priorities of the MOJ are sometimes curious and that we have a major problem of access to justice in this country. I would not agree, however, that a review of how provision is made for use of the Welsh language in the courts in Wales should be taken off the 'to do' list. The re-emergence of Welsh as one of the two official languages of Welsh law and courts has necessitated some investment of cost and time and not to facilitate the use of Welsh by court users would be wasteful of that investment. A bi-lingual jurisdiction can have benefits for the development of the law and access to justice. E.g. legislation in two languages needs to be clear and short, unlike the Westminster model of statutory drafting, which seeks to cover every possible eventuality. In Welsh law, consolidation and codification of the law is being pursued, giving readier access to the law and reduced complexity and cost of litigation - something that the English lawmakers and courts would do well to follow (as I think the Law Commission would agree).