Please fill in the form to report an unsuitable comment. Please state which comment is of concern and why. It will be sent to our moderator for review.
If I recall correctly, gaming contracts are anyway void/unenforceable for illegality. So why should someone 'cheating' (= improving the odds in his favour and away from a purveyor of void/unenforceable contracts) be guilty? Was the defendant 'dishonest' by the standards of reasonable people? Maybe not.
Copyright © 2019 The Law Society
Site powered by Webvision Cloud