Report comment

Paul T J

The 'negligence panel' was a beast of the complaints handling arm of The Law Society. It was used to deal with cases which fell outside the scope of the complaints resolution process. Referral to the NP didn not mean that you had a good case, only that you had asserted that you had. I saw some NP cases which would only make sense when heavily medicated or lacking a grip on reality and or a very tenuous understanding of law and fact.

The solicitors appointed to defend the claim would have been appointed by the solicitor's insurers then a mutual called the Solicitors Indemnity Fund (SIF, now no giggling at the back).

I have read your account on 'victims-unite.net' and to suggest that all in sundry were negligent and or engaged in a conspiracy against you is, not atypical of the cases that we see from time to time.

PS the comments you make about M&R are highly defamatory and I would if I were at M&R be getting my pre-aciton letter out sharpish.