Report comment

Re Martin Maloney at 1831.

I admitted I haven’t heard of AJP Taylor. So what? I doubt many others of the referendum electorate have heard of him either. You obviously have a soft spot for him. But a referendum question of such constitutional importance isn’t about “determining tactics”. Tactics is about how the government implements the result, not the result itself. What does this AJP chap have to say about a referendum that sets out to frame a question bilaterally when one answer (remain) was known and simply implemented whereas the other (leave) meant completely different things to different voters and one interpretation will not even satisfy the majority let alone the miinority? Do educate me further.