Oh, for more judges like Texan bankruptcy judge Leif Clark. He recently faced a motion that was challengingly entitled: 'Defendant's motion to discharge response to plaintiff's response to defendant's response opposing objection to discharge.' In response, Judge Clark issued an 'Order denying motion for incomprehensibility'. He went on: 'The court cannot determine the substance, if any, of the defendant's legal argument, nor can the court even ascertain the relief that the defendant is requesting.' But what has caught the attention is the footnote: 'Or, in the words of the competition judge to Adam Sandler's title character in the movie, "Billy Madison", after Billy Madison had responded to a question with an answer that sounded superficially reasonable but lacked any substance: "Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I've ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response was there anything that could even be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul." Deciphering motions like the one presented here wastes valuable chamber staff time, and invites this sort of footnote.'