Opinion – Page 229
-
OpinionMaking the silk cut
It is time for an overhaul of QC appointments to make the system fit for purpose and access talent from both branches of the profession.
-
-
OpinionDebunking stereotypes of criminals
Challenging public attitudes would help the government fulfil its ambitious plans for penal reform.
-
OpinionHousing consultation rethink is needed
Stamp duty timetable highlights more than just conveyancing concerns.
-
OpinionNicely Nicely Gove sees off noble sneers
Lord chancellor gives a little away on the forthcoming draft British bill of rights.
-
OpinionTax and professional secrecy
Lawyers are safe from having to disclose details of tax schemes. For now.
-
OpinionForcing Russia to pay over Litvinenko
Alexander Litvinenko’s widow may find that winning a judgment against Russia is easier than enforcing one.
-
Opinion
Court interpreting: lesson in failure
We are told that the outsourced provision of interpreter services is gradually improving, but Capita is marking its own homework.
-
Opinion
Living on a swear
Should the fees for swearing an affidavit or administering a statutory declaration be increased?
-
OpinionGove the arch-pragmatist
There is rarely a political dividend in defending the blatantly indefensible.
-
OpinionJustice in disrepair
An online court has its merits but it cannot remedy inequality of arms.
-
OpinionRESTAURANT REVIEW: The Ivy Market Grill, 1 Henrietta Street, London WC2
The food is prepared with top-class ingredients and the minimum of fuss.
-
OpinionBOOK REVIEW: Conveyancing Handbook (22nd edition)
This has become a must-have for every property practitioner since 1992.
-
OpinionFixed fees: what will it mean?
Litigators may not welcome Jackson’s sweeping changes but extending fixed fees could improve access to the courts.
-
OpinionLSB: a response to Jonathan Goldsmith
LSB chair responds to yesterday’s Comment piece by Jonathan Goldsmith on the role of the board in liberalising the market for legal services.
-
OpinionA big case for 2016
The Supreme Court will address an important issue on the finality of settlements.
-
OpinionClin neg: conflict of interests
When the government is defendant in medical or military claims, it shouldn’t be involved in reducing them.