Report comment

A high court judge admitted at a morning briefing that he give his order to one side, not on the merits of evidence but because it was the opponent barrister's turn to have a win even though all the evidence was against his client. In a patronising manner, he assured the defeated barrister that if she come to see him next time she was representing before him, he would see she got the win. Why bother with going to court if this is the manner of procedings?