Report comment

So you want me to accept payment to stop posting in here as you think this forum should be left to professionals and not crack pots like me you say,
I've seen the harm professionals like you do to those unsuspecting people who don't understand what is really going on in our courts, you can quote acts to me all day long, I dint care about those acts, all I care about is the fact that a man has a right to face his accuser and cross examine his accuser, not some minion who is employed by a local authority who hasn't the first hand knowledge of the facts, but comes into a court under oath as if if they do have first hand knowledge of he facts.
I also care that a man can be arrested for a child support case brought to court for non payment of a £13000 alleged arrears, that man is found guilty of wilful refusal in a civil case and given a 6 weeks suspended prison sentence and ordered to pay the costs of £350 at £10 per week. The order I writing from the court is to pay the court and not the prosecution £10 per week which he quite happily does so, the CSA then start too heater that man because he hasn't paid the £10 per week to the CSA. We requested a copy of the order from the CSA that alleges he has to pay them the £10 per week, which they had to admit they didn't have one.
That man is then summoned back to court again under a double jeopardy case, the district judge stated he was ordered to pay the CSA direct, and even when we put the order sent by the court to pay the court direct in front of the District judge, she denied the order was sent out. The court however had accepted payments of £280 and kept hold of it instead of sending it to the CSA, so now we had the court holding onto monies for months on end denying the Child the Child Support they were entitled to.
So you sit there and tell me I'm a crack pot when we have Magistrates, judges and employees of Local Authorities who are authorised under the say so of the local government act 1972 who don't even understand the Child Support Act or the difference between and criminal procedure.
Shall I mention with the case where one firm of solicitors sent a paralegal into a case in chambers, and I placed the judge on notice the man was a paralegal and had no rights of audience in private chambers and the judge had him removed, I can give you Mr Anon a copy of the transcript of that case if you don't belive me, shall I also mention the case in Crown Court where a recorder sitting on the bench tried to obtain costs for the CPS under the guise of a fine?