Comment and opinion – Page 182
-
OpinionMedia lose marbles over Amal
Barrister Amal Alamuddin continues to make the wrong sort of headlines.
-
OpinionRTA claims: what’s going on
A rise in traffic accident damages may disguise a worrying trend in settlements.
-
OpinionShakespeare and lawyers
We should stop obsessing over one of the playwright’s most famous lines. It was just a joke.
-
OpinionWet signature's long goodbye
The government takes a modest step towards electronic identity verification.
-
OpinionLawyers lead from the front
Lawyers can spearhead a serious debate about the future of our constitution.
-
OpinionAmericans on the march
M&A tables give our largest firms cause to reflect on their position in the global market.
-
-
-
OpinionWhere the UK ranks with Azerbaijan
The two countries have the lowest proportion of female judges in Europe.
-
OpinionLib Dems go to their graves full of regret
A time in government presented a chance for a Liberal agenda at the MoJ – that chance has been wasted.
-
OpinionBritish rights are best, OK
Is there a difference between a British bill of rights and a bill of British rights – other than the change in place of the word ‘British’?
-
-
-
OpinionCounting on legal services
In terms of resource, the big accountants dwarf our largest firms.
-
OpinionGrayling’s problem is beyond carelessness
Mesothelioma ruling just another example where government tried to bulldoze through policy.
-
OpinionInterpreting on trial
The professionalism of the Nuremberg interpreters highlights shortcomings in current UK standards.
-
OpinionEtymology of execution
In reporting atrocities we try to employ the correct terminology for the sake of clarity, not political statement.
-
OpinionDon’t milk the cash cow
London needs to safeguard its status as the leading centre for international legal services.
-
OpinionThe future, imperfect
Lawyers must not run scared of technological innovation – some law is better than none.
-
OpinionNot right for the job?
Should the prime minister have given the post of lord chancellor to a non-lawyer who still harbours political ambitions?